Introduction:
Starship Troopers is ostensibly about warriors of the future battling against
giant bugs in a struggle for survival of the species. However, this film can
be viewed on many more levels than the simple "shoot-em-up" action adventure
movie. While ostensibly depicting a Nazi-like fascist future, the film uses
mise-en-scene, graphics, voice-over, media clips, unconventional camera perspectives,
and fake blood to create parallels to American society, media culture, and propaganda.
The result is a striking cultural critique.
Synopsis:
Starship Troopers centers around the adventures of Johnny Rico (Casper Van
Dien). It is late in the 23rd century, and Rico is a promising young man about
to graduate from high school. His girlfriend, Carmen Ibanez (Denise Richards),
wants to join the Fleet Academy to become a spaceship pilot and a Citizen. Rico's
best friend, Carl Jenkins (Neil Patrick Harris, AKA Dougie Howser), is telepathic,
and wants to do Federal Service too.
The three friends enlist together. Ibanez gets into pilot training because
of her high math scores. Jenkins, for his telepathy, is assigned to "Games and
Theory," which is a branch of Military Intelligence. Rico has good looks and
a nice body, but not much else, and ends up in the Mobile Infantry, at the bottom
of the pecking order. Rico survives boot camp along with other recruits including
Dizzy Flores (Dina Meyer), who has harbored a crush on Rico from their school
days, and Ace Levy (Jake Busey) who becomes Rico's buddy. Rico works his way
up to squad leader. When a recruit is killed under his command, he is about
to resign, until a meteor hits Buenos Aires and war is declared.
The meteor was shot from the Klendathu system by a race of giant insects.
The Federal Council declares war on them, and Rico and his friends are in the
first wave to invade Klendathu. Things go rather poorly.
The film is peppered with brief interludes on the Federal Network, the futuristic
news service. The film is structured around these clips, giving them significance.
In fact, the first and last scenes of the movie are news clips. At each critical
juncture in the movie, a news clip is shown. Their importance can not be underestimated,
and will be dealt with in depth.
Nazis and Nationalism:
The first layer of analysis brings us to a parallel between the Mobile Infantry
and Hitler's Wehrmacht. The film uses aspects of mise-en-scene, such as setting
and costume, to draw strong connections between these two military organizations
The gray uniforms and black trench-coats sported by military intelligence
are also Nazi-esque. Rows of soldiers uniformed in black create a vaguely fascist
backdrop for events. Of course, the similarities between a military regime which
based its ideology around war and service on the one hand, and Hitler's Third
Reich on the other, hardly need to be mentioned. As Rasczak notes, "Physical
conflict has resolved more issues in the history of mankind than all other factors
combined."
FED NET & CNN:
The news service in Starship Troopers, the Federal Network, can hardly be
called impartial. It is similar to CNN in several respects. On the Fed Net there
is a section titled "Why We Fight." They show maps of the Klendathu System and
show how bug meteors are hurled toward Earth from an asteroid belt. This is
reminiscent of the endless maps shown on CNN during the Gulf War.
The opening scene is a news clip calling on young people to do Federal Service,
since "Service guarantees Citizenship." The slogan "Join Up Now" is plastered
across a screen full of neatly regimented troops. Next is a segment on a bug
meteor that was headed to earth, but "Planetary defenses are better than ever!"
and the meteor was shot down. This is followed a section titled "Why We Fight,"
an explanation of where the meteors come from, namely the bug planet Klendathu,
whose gravitational field produces "a limitless supply of bug meteors." The
bugs use plasma to shoot the meteors out of orbit and toward Earth. Suddenly,
there is an interruption in the broadcast and the announcer says, "We break
net now to take you live to the invasion of Klendathu." We see a reporter declaring,
"It's an UGLY planet, a BUG planet..." He doesn't get to finish his sentence,
since a giant bug rips him in half. As we watch, the invasion begins to go very
badly. (See clips) We see Johnny Rico mauled by a bug and as he screams the
transmission is interrupted. Flashback to one year earlier.
Eventually, having followed Rico's adventures through boot camp, we see him
arrive on Klendathu and a remarkable thing happens. We view the invasion this
time from the perspective of the troops, so that we can see the Fed Net camera
man filming everything. Special prominence is given to how he keeps filming
as the anchor is picked up by a bug and ripped in half, as other soldiers are
killed, and how the camera man himself is impaled by a bug while trying to get
a better shot. This unique and unusual view of the same scene from two different
perspectives lends significance to the movie in several ways.
First, this scene of the Klendathu invasion is reminiscent of CNN's coverage
of the Gulf War. The live coverage by a camera man and reporter brings the war
into the living room. The first viewing reinforces our common conceptions of
war-reporting by presenting it in the classical fashion. The second time, the
audience, which can be expected to have watched the Gulf War on TV, is forced
to reconsider assumptions made about the impartiality of the camera. We see
the camera man choose to shoot some things over others. We also see things which
the camera didn't catch. When half of a body flies and hits Rico, knocking him
down, the camera in the first scene was pointing a different direction. This
depiction of extreme gore is a strong reminder that we are often not shown just
how gruesome war really is.
This scene draws on CNN's legacy of coverage in another way. The landing scene
seems to be a direct parallel of the images the US saw of bombs raining down
on Baghdad. The reporting of Peter Arnett and Brad Shaw comes to mind. The clips
of the bombardment of Baghdad on CNN Interactive nicely reinforce my point.
It would seem that the producers of Starship Troopers were highly conscious
of the media legacy they were imitating, and were consciously tailoring the
film to our expectations of a TV War, while taking the opportunity to stretch
our assumptions as well.
The Media:
In one particularly satirical news clip, the future's draconian system of
justice is showcased. The announcer intones, "A murderer was caught this morning
and tried today." The judge declares, "Guilty!" The announcer resumes, "Execution
tonight at six, all net, all channels." We may laugh at this, and declare how
different it is from our world. However, the irony lies in the fact that it
is much closer than we like to think. The media's judgement of guilt or innocence
is often all to swift, as the security guard at the Olympic Park bombing can
attest. People are tried on the five o'clock news, weighed in the balance and
found wanting by the time the weather comes on at 5:15. O. J. Simpson, whether
he murdered his wife or not, was found guilty by the media long before he was
found innocent. President Clinton is going through a similar process. The media
has judged him guilty, but just a little bit, and the public is ready to move
on. If only the impeachment process could move as fast! The seemingly farcical
elements of Starship Troopers conceal a deeper cultural critique.
The news clips in Starship Troopers also incorporate aspects of internet culture.
The format of the screen, with a toolbar across the top and the ever-present
"Would you like to know more?" link at the bottom are only the most obvious
examples. The format allows us to navigate quickly from topic to topic with
little continuity, as does the internet. It also allows us to pick and choose
what to see, while at the same time providing us with an almost constant stream
of propaganda on "A World That Works," "Join Up Now," "Know Your Foe," "Do Your
Part," etc. It helps to be of the MTV generation in watching these vignettes,
since the action moves so quickly from topic to topic. In fact, the format plays
directly to the ten second attention span, which is the average length of each
news item.
Victory At Sea:
Of course, Starship Troopers is only one of the more recent films in a great
legacy of propaganda films, stretching all the way back to "Birth of a Nation."
When I first saw Starship Troopers I was reminded of the 1950s documentary Victory
At Sea, which chronicled the naval actions of World War II. One episode of the
series stands out in particular as similar to Starship Troopers: Guadalcanal.
The general theme is the same in both. Guadalcanal was the first land invasion
in the Pacific, and like Klendathu, the first waves suffered tremendous casualties.
As the anchor on Klendathu says, "It's an UGLY planet! A BUG planet!" This sentiment
was echoed by the announcer in Victory At Sea, who declares that "...in 1942
Guadalcanal was wild jungle, 90 miles of festering malaria and rainforest, bypassed
for centuries by history, forgotten by man." The climate was degraded, and the
enemy was vilified. As the biology teacher in Starship Troopers says, the bug
"Has no ego, has no fear, doesn't know about death, and so makes the perfect
member of society." Compare this with the opinion of the Japanese that "Theirs
not to reason why. Theirs but to do and die. And die they will. And die they
do!"
The History Channel Online gives this description of the Guadalcanal episode:
"The heroic account of one of the most dramatic and tragic battles of the Pacific
campaign. [TV G]" A dramatic and tragic battle, yet suitable for general audiences,
says something about what we are and aren't shown. We aren't shown the true
gruesome aspects of war, and so our viewing is slanted away from tragedy and
toward patriotic heroism. The narration supports this view: "If there was horror
and ferocity, there was also courage and self-sacrifice. If there was death,
filth, and disease, the marines turned the tide of war and stopped their enemy.
The Japanese will advance no further. And as the surviving Marines wave goodbye,
one of the greatest tales of heroism slips out of focus into history. To these
men go the honors accorded the Greeks at Thermopolae, the Colonials at Valley
Forge, the British at Waterloo, and now, the Americans at Guadalcanal."
Compare this patriotic hyperbole to that of Jenkins upon the capture of the
brain bug: "One day it will all be over, and everyone will forget that this
was the moment, this was when it turned. And it wasn't the mighty fleet, it
wasn't some fancy new weapon, it was a drill instructor named Zim who captured
a brain." Both films seek to immortalize and glorify what is in reality a sordid
and bloody business.
There are further parallels between the two works. The troops spill out of
their transports in similar fashion, although the paid actors in Starship Troopers
seem more enthusiastic. In both cases, we cut away to the governing body for
an explanation of broader strategy, be it the Federal Council in Geneva or the
Joint Chiefs in the Pentagon. Speaking of broader strategy, the island hopping
scheme of World War II is reprised by Rasczak when he says that they will work
on taking the outlying planets first.
These parallels and others demonstrate that the propaganda lampooned by Starship
Troopers is not limited to wartime Germany, but exists within our history and
within our media culture. Starship Troopers draws as strongly on CNN and Victory
At Sea as it does on Nazi Germany.
In addition to parallels with Victory At Sea, there are significant parallels
within Starship Troopers itself. The prime parallel is between the humans and
the bugs. Compare the clips of humans swarming out of their transports and across
the landscape with those of the bugs on Planet P, shortly before they are introduced
to napalm. Furthermore, when troopers are killing bugs on Planet P, they soon
get covered in bug guts, a sticky green or red liquid. This is easily compared
to the copious amounts of red blood that flow from Dizzy's wounds and mouth.
Carmen, when she is captured by the brain bug, emerges from the ordeal with
green bug guts running down her right side and crimson red blood running from
a wound on her left. A more explicit comparison would be hard to find.
The implication, that we are not so dissimilar after all, has several consequences.
Primarily, it calls into question the notion of "other" that is espoused so
often. One commentator on a talk show in Starship Troopers declares that, "Frankly,
I find the notion of a bug that thinks offensive!" How similar this is to the
dehumanization that Iraqis experienced during the Gulf War. In the news clip
entitled "Do Your Part," school children stomp on little beetles and chant "Kill,
kill," while their mother looks on, laughing and clapping. The disfavor the
works of German composers faced during World War II is a similarly ludicrous
example of fervent war spirit. What Starship Troopers is really challenging
is not totalitarianism per se, but war and ultra-nationalism wherever they may
be found, including the United States.
Feminist Critique:
On a slightly different track, we must consider that the brain bug has what
appears to be a vagina in the middle of it's face. This could be taken several
ways. The fact that this feature is central to the brain bug's interaction with
others could play into the hands of feminist thinkers who posit sexuality as
the medium through which all people interact. Since the brain bug is posited
as the enemy, this could be a masculine reaction against the power that female
sexuality holds over men. It is significant that the brain bug uses this particular
anatomical feature on several occasions to suck men's brains out. Perhaps this
is a feminist statement that men become brainless twits when they have a woman's
sexual organs on/in their minds. Of course, the brain bug, in comparison to
the other bugs in the film, is defenseless, impotent, and fearful, playing into
the hands of the chauvinists in the crowd. On the other hand, it is by far the
most intelligent bug we've met, giving the feminists something to crow about.
The imagery is relatively straightforward, but the implications are terribly
convoluted. I feel that I have barely scratched the surface, so that a fuller
explanation will have to await another paper.
Conclusion:
Starship Troopers is a masterfully constructed film which is pregnant with
subtler meaning. Ostensibly full of propaganda, it is meant to be read as entertainment
by a postmodern, media-savvy audience. I watch Cops and Victory At Sea in the
same manner, deriving pleasure from discerning the veiled ideologies and then
laughing at them. However, there are deeper messages than those of quasi-Nazi
propaganda. The parallels to American culture are real and significant, and
make this movie more than just an action flick. As a cultural critique and yet
wildly entertaining film, Starship Troopers conveys meaning at whatever level
the viewer is willing to look.
The world of the late
23rd century, as portrayed by Starship Troopers, is a "Fascist Utopia," in the
words of Blinn Combs, my Sophomore roommate. As Rico's History teacher, Jean
Rasczak (Michael Ironside) explains, "We learned about the failure of democracy,
how the social scientists brought our world to the brink of destruction, how
the veterans took control and imposed the stability that has lasted to this
day." In this world, where "something given has no value," the right to vote
must be earned through Federal Service. Only after two years in the military
can a civilian become a Citizen, with the power to exercise political will.
The insignia are only the most obvious parallel. The "National Eagle" insignia
on my web page is from the Command Flag of the National Leader of the SS (Kommandostander
der Reichsfuehrer SS), and was widely used on German uniforms. Compare this
with the insignia of the Mobile Infantry, worn on berets and caps. Both consist
of silver eagle's wings clutching the symbol of the organization, in one case
a swastika, and in the other a knife. The image of the knife is a recurring
theme in Starship Troopers. While the cadets are practicing knife throwing,
Ace asks Sergeant Zim what good a knife is in a nuke fight, where all you have
to do is push a button. Zim replies, "Put your hand against that wall!" and
taking a knife, throws it with disheartening accuracy, piercing Ace's hand and
pinning him to the wall. Zim walks up to him and to the other recruits declares,
"The enemy cannot push a button if you disable his hand!" In this context, the
knife becomes a symbol of authoritarian brutality, much like the swastika.
Victory At Sea uses several techniques that lend a patriotic slant to the supposedly
impartial documentary genre. First among these is the beautiful musical score.
The use of threatening and minor "Oriental" chords cues the viewer to Japanese
approach, vilifying the enemy subtly. Conversely, as the American troops embark,
we hear a patriotic march, complete with a trio section. This musical motif
is reprised during the interlude on America's home-front in greater exposition.
Since musical cues are often received subconsciously, they can be all the more
effective at creating an general impression or feeling in the viewer. The producer
was not unconscious of this technique, and neither should we be.